Sachin Tendulkar resorts to a food analogy to explain the pecking order of cricket’s formats.
What do you think about this?
Wednesday, January 27th, 2010 | Author: Cricket
Category: Champions League Twenty20
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
6 Responses
T20 is not a dessert.
Because I always like desserts but not always T20.
T20 is more like an individual snack. You can eat it once but then you had enough and want something else.
What sachin says is definetly true T20 is just one dimension of cricket.
Without all the aspects Cricket would be hopeless and boring
And whats the problem in explaining thru food , it is one of the things that people understand. (yummm!!!!!)
Not even a dessert, Just a little munchie until something better comes along.
??????????/
i would have referred to 20/20 as an appetiser
I agree with Sachin. T20 is only for children, or those lacking intelligence and adult development.